What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Early-demographic dividend and Fiji?

0.42 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Fiji?

6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Early-demographic dividend vs Fiji: IDA resource allocation index

Early-demographic dividend

3.15 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Fiji

3.57 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Early-demographic dividend rank

22nd

Fiji rank

23rd

IDA resource allocation index over time

Early-demographic dividend
Fiji

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 3.57 1=low to 6=high against 3.15 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.42 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Fiji ranks 23rd of 42 groups.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Early-demographic dividend or Fiji?: Fiji, at 3.57 1=low to 6=high against 3.15 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Early-demographic dividend and Fiji?: 0.42 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Fiji?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Fiji rank globally for ida resource allocation index?: Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Fiji ranks 23rd of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Fiji: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/early-demographic-dividend/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/early-demographic-dividend/fiji/">Early-demographic dividend vs Fiji: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).