Early-demographic dividend vs Mauritania: IDA resource allocation index

Early-demographic dividend
3.15 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mauritania
3.65 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
22nd
Mauritania rank
20th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Mauritania
01234200520152025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 3.65 1=low to 6=high against 3.15 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.5 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Mauritania ranks 20th of 42 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 3.39 1=low to 6=high 3.27 1=low to 6=high 0.1195 1=low to 6=high Early-demographic dividend
2010s 3.32 1=low to 6=high 3.31 1=low to 6=high 0.0154 1=low to 6=high Early-demographic dividend
2020s 3.21 1=low to 6=high 3.49 1=low to 6=high 0.2796 1=low to 6=high Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Early-demographic dividend or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 3.65 1=low to 6=high against 3.15 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Early-demographic dividend and Mauritania?
0.5 1=low to 6=high, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Mauritania?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Mauritania rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Mauritania ranks 20th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Mauritania: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/early-demographic-dividend/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/early-demographic-dividend/mauritania/">Early-demographic dividend vs Mauritania: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).