East Asia & Pacific vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index

East Asia & Pacific
3.05 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
3.44 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
31st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
34th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
01234200520152025

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 3.44 1=low to 6=high against 3.05 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.39 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 31st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 34th of 42 groups.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 3.27 1=low to 6=high 3.83 1=low to 6=high 0.5652 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 3.19 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 0.4796 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 3.06 1=low to 6=high 3.62 1=low to 6=high 0.5635 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, East Asia & Pacific or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 3.44 1=low to 6=high against 3.05 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between East Asia & Pacific and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.39 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 31st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 34th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">East Asia & Pacific vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).