East Asia & Pacific vs Uganda: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 3.47 1=low to 6=high against 3.05 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.42 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 31st of 42 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 3.88 1=low to 6=high | 0.6119 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2010s | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | 0.5112 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2020s | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | 0.4843 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, East Asia & Pacific or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 3.47 1=low to 6=high against 3.05 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between East Asia & Pacific and Uganda?
- 0.42 1=low to 6=high, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Uganda rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 31st of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).