Europe & Central Asia vs Georgia: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Europe & Central Asia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 4.44 1=low to 6=high against 3.68 1=low to 6=high in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0.76 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Europe & Central Asia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 1st and Georgia ranks 1st of 42 groups.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 4.21 1=low to 6=high | 0.5088 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
| 2010s | 3.72 1=low to 6=high | 4.44 1=low to 6=high | 0.7135 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Europe & Central Asia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 4.44 1=low to 6=high against 3.68 1=low to 6=high in Europe & Central Asia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Europe & Central Asia and Georgia?
- 0.76 1=low to 6=high, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Georgia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Europe & Central Asia and Georgia rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 1st and Georgia ranks 1st of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).