Fiji vs Kyrgyzstan: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Fiji
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.64 1=low to 6=high against 3.57 1=low to 6=high in Fiji, a difference of 0.07 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Fiji ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 85 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Fiji or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.64 1=low to 6=high against 3.57 1=low to 6=high in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Fiji and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.07 1=low to 6=high, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Fiji ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).