Guinea vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: IDA resource allocation index

Guinea
3.35 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
2.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Guinea rank
37th
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
40th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Guinea
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
0123200520152025

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 3.35 1=low to 6=high against 2.33 1=low to 6=high in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 1.02 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ahead.

Guinea ranks 37th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 40th of 85 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 2.96 1=low to 6=high 3.14 1=low to 6=high 0.184 1=low to 6=high Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
2010s 3.04 1=low to 6=high 2.89 1=low to 6=high 0.1537 1=low to 6=high Guinea
2020s 3.34 1=low to 6=high 2.55 1=low to 6=high 0.788 1=low to 6=high Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Guinea or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
Guinea, at 3.35 1=low to 6=high against 2.33 1=low to 6=high in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Guinea and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
1.02 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Guinea and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Guinea ranks 37th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 40th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/guinea/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/guinea/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/">Guinea vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).