Honduras vs Lesotho: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Honduras
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 3.27 1=low to 6=high against 3.26 1=low to 6=high in Honduras, a difference of 0.01 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 44th and Lesotho ranks 43rd of 84 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | 0.2583 1=low to 6=high | Honduras |
| 2010s | 3.48 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 0.0983 1=low to 6=high | Honduras |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | 0.0486 1=low to 6=high | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Honduras or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 3.27 1=low to 6=high against 3.26 1=low to 6=high in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Honduras and Lesotho?
- 0.01 1=low to 6=high, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lesotho?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Lesotho rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Honduras ranks 44th and Lesotho ranks 43rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).