Kosovo vs Late-demographic dividend: IDA resource allocation index

Kosovo
3.97 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend
3.52 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Kosovo rank
4th
Late-demographic dividend rank
6th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Kosovo
  • Late-demographic dividend
01234200520152025

How they compare

Kosovo currently reports 3.97 1=low to 6=high against 3.52 1=low to 6=high in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.45 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.1 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Kosovo ranks 4th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 6th of 85 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Late-demographic dividend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
2000s 3.43 1=low to 6=high 3.78 1=low to 6=high 0.3439 1=low to 6=high Late-demographic dividend
2010s 3.53 1=low to 6=high 3.62 1=low to 6=high 0.0827 1=low to 6=high Late-demographic dividend
2020s 3.81 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.3103 1=low to 6=high Kosovo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Kosovo or Late-demographic dividend?
Kosovo, at 3.97 1=low to 6=high against 3.52 1=low to 6=high in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Kosovo and Late-demographic dividend?
0.45 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Late-demographic dividend?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Kosovo and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Kosovo ranks 4th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 6th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kosovo vs Late-demographic dividend: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/kosovo/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/kosovo/late-demographic-dividend/">Kosovo vs Late-demographic dividend: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).