Least developed countries vs Mongolia: IDA resource allocation index

Least developed countries
2.96 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mongolia
3.36 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Least developed countries rank
37th
Mongolia rank
35th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Mongolia
0123200520152025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 3.36 1=low to 6=high against 2.96 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.4 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 37th and Mongolia ranks 35th of 42 groups.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.15 1=low to 6=high 3.38 1=low to 6=high 0.2295 1=low to 6=high Mongolia
2010s 3.09 1=low to 6=high 3.34 1=low to 6=high 0.2566 1=low to 6=high Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Least developed countries or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 3.36 1=low to 6=high against 2.96 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries as of 2019.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Least developed countries and Mongolia?
0.4 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Mongolia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Least developed countries and Mongolia rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Least developed countries ranks 37th and Mongolia ranks 35th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Mongolia: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mongolia/">Least developed countries vs Mongolia: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).