Lower middle income vs Mauritania: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Lower middle income
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 3.65 1=low to 6=high against 3.25 1=low to 6=high in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.4 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Lower middle income's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lower middle income ahead.
Lower middle income ranks 19th and Mauritania ranks 19th of 42 groups.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 0.0351 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 3.31 1=low to 6=high | 0.0389 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 0.2442 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Lower middle income or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 3.65 1=low to 6=high against 3.25 1=low to 6=high in Lower middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Lower middle income and Mauritania?
- 0.4 1=low to 6=high, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Mauritania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Lower middle income and Mauritania rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Lower middle income ranks 19th and Mauritania ranks 19th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).