Malawi vs Tuvalu: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Malawi
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 2.88 1=low to 6=high against 2.86 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.02 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 65th and Tuvalu ranks 66th of 84 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 2.84 1=low to 6=high | 0.3354 1=low to 6=high | Malawi |
| 2020s | 3.03 1=low to 6=high | 2.85 1=low to 6=high | 0.1764 1=low to 6=high | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Malawi or Tuvalu?
- Malawi, at 2.88 1=low to 6=high against 2.86 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Malawi and Tuvalu?
- 0.02 1=low to 6=high, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tuvalu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Tuvalu rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Malawi ranks 65th and Tuvalu ranks 66th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).