Micronesia, Federated States of vs Papua New Guinea: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 2.85 1=low to 6=high against 2.82 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.03 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 70th and Papua New Guinea ranks 68th of 84 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 0.3722 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | 0.0486 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Micronesia, Federated States of or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 2.85 1=low to 6=high against 2.82 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Micronesia, Federated States of and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.03 1=low to 6=high, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 70th and Papua New Guinea ranks 68th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).