Republic of Moldova vs Saint Lucia: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 3.73 1=low to 6=high against 3.72 1=low to 6=high in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.01 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 14th and Saint Lucia ranks 13th of 84 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.69 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.2367 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 3.76 1=low to 6=high | 3.66 1=low to 6=high | 0.1008 1=low to 6=high | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Republic of Moldova or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 3.73 1=low to 6=high against 3.72 1=low to 6=high in Republic of Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Republic of Moldova and Saint Lucia?
- 0.01 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Saint Lucia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Saint Lucia rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 14th and Saint Lucia ranks 13th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).