Mongolia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Mongolia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 3.44 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in Mongolia, a difference of 0.08 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 35th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 33rd of 84 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | 0.46 1=low to 6=high | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.3283 1=low to 6=high | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Mongolia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 3.44 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Mongolia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.08 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Mongolia ranks 35th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 33rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).