Pacific island small states vs Vietnam: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Pacific island small states
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 3.69 1=low to 6=high against 3.17 1=low to 6=high in Pacific island small states, a difference of 0.52 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.2 times Pacific island small states's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Pacific island small states ranks 20th and Vietnam ranks 18th of 42 groups.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pacific island small states | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.564 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 0.5834 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Pacific island small states or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 3.69 1=low to 6=high against 3.17 1=low to 6=high in Pacific island small states as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Pacific island small states and Vietnam?
- 0.52 1=low to 6=high, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific island small states and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Pacific island small states and Vietnam rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Pacific island small states ranks 20th and Vietnam ranks 18th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).