Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Uganda: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 3.47 1=low to 6=high against 3.44 1=low to 6=high in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.03 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 31st of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | 3.88 1=low to 6=high | 0.0467 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2010s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | 0.0317 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2020s | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | 0.0792 1=low to 6=high | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 3.47 1=low to 6=high against 3.44 1=low to 6=high in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uganda?
- 0.03 1=low to 6=high, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uganda rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 31st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).