Denmark vs Uzbekistan: Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on
Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on over time
- Denmark
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.9307 against 0.9118 in Denmark, a difference of 0.0189.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Denmark ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 58th of 80 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9336 | 0.91 | 0.0236 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.9118 | 0.9307 | 0.0189 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on, Denmark or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.9307 against 0.9118 in Denmark as of 2020.
- What is the difference in interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on between Denmark and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0189, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Uzbekistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and Uzbekistan rank globally for interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on?
- Denmark ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 58th of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.