Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritius: Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on
Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.4 against 1.31 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.09.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mauritius ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 2nd of 80 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritius?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.4 against 1.31 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 0.09, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius rank globally for interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 2nd of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.