Malta vs Uganda: Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on
Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on over time
- Malta
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.9998 against 0.9992 in Malta, a difference of 0.0006.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 23rd and Uganda ranks 21st of 80 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9993 | 1 | 0.0007 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.9992 | 0.9998 | 0.0006 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on, Malta or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.9998 against 0.9992 in Malta as of 2020.
- What is the difference in interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on between Malta and Uganda?
- 0.0006, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Malta and Uganda rank globally for interest, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on?
- Malta ranks 23rd and Uganda ranks 21st of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Interest, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.