Israel vs South Asia: Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with

Israel
203,000 number of cases
in 2023
South Asia
67,000 number of cases
in 2023
Israel rank
14th
South Asia rank
16th

Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with over time

  • Israel
  • South Asia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200920162023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 203,000 number of cases against 67,000 number of cases in South Asia, a difference of 136,000 number of cases.

That makes Israel's figure about 3.0 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Asia ahead.

Israel ranks 14th and South Asia ranks 16th of 41 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and South Asia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel South Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 3,263 number of cases 185,788 number of cases 182,525 number of cases South Asia
2020s 52,575 number of cases 21,345 number of cases 31,230 number of cases Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with, Israel or South Asia?
Israel, at 203,000 number of cases against 67,000 number of cases in South Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with between Israel and South Asia?
136,000 number of cases, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and South Asia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Israel and South Asia rank globally for internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with?
Israel ranks 14th and South Asia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), published as Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with conflict and violence (number of cases). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs South Asia: Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with. Statizoid, drawing on Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/internally-displaced-persons-new-displacement-associated-with-conflict-and-violence/israel/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/internally-displaced-persons-new-displacement-associated-with-conflict-and-violence/israel/south-asia/">Israel vs South Asia: Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with conflict and violence (number of cases)
Unit
number of cases
Source
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 601 data points, 2009–2023
Last refreshed

Internally displaced persons are defined according to the 1998 Guiding Principles (http://www.internal-displacement.org/publications/1998/ocha-guiding-principles-on-internal-displacement) as people or groups of people who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of armed conflict, or to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, violations of human rights, or natural or human-made disasters and who have not crossed an international border. "New Displacement" refers to the number of new cases or incidents of displacement recorded over the specified year, rather than the number of people displaced. This is done because people may have been displaced more than once.