China vs IDA & IBRD total: Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with

China
4.70 million number of cases
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total
25.67 million number of cases
in 2023
China rank
1st
IDA & IBRD total rank
2nd

Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with over time

  • China
  • IDA & IBRD total
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M200820152023

How they compare

IDA & IBRD total currently reports 25.67 million number of cases against 4.70 million number of cases in China, a difference of 20.96 million number of cases.

That makes IDA & IBRD total's figure about 5.5 times China's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, IDA & IBRD total has been ahead every year.

China ranks 1st and IDA & IBRD total ranks 2nd of 148 countries.

IDA & IBRD total has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
2000s 11.35 million number of cases 25.05 million number of cases 13.70 million number of cases IDA & IBRD total
2010s 5.92 million number of cases 21.80 million number of cases 15.88 million number of cases IDA & IBRD total
2020s 4.86 million number of cases 27.02 million number of cases 22.15 million number of cases IDA & IBRD total

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with, China or IDA & IBRD total?
IDA & IBRD total, at 25.67 million number of cases against 4.70 million number of cases in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with between China and IDA & IBRD total?
20.96 million number of cases, with IDA & IBRD total ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and IDA & IBRD total?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do China and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with?
China ranks 1st and IDA & IBRD total ranks 2nd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), published as Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs IDA & IBRD total: Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with. Statizoid, drawing on Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/internally-displaced-persons-new-displacement-associated-with-disasters-number-of-cases/china/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/internally-displaced-persons-new-displacement-associated-with-disasters-number-of-cases/china/ida-and-ibrd-total/">China vs IDA & IBRD total: Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)
Unit
number of cases
Source
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,233 data points, 2008–2023
Last refreshed

Internally displaced persons are defined according to the 1998 Guiding Principles (http://www.internal-displacement.org/publications/1998/ocha-guiding-principles-on-internal-displacement) as people or groups of people who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of armed conflict, or to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, violations of human rights, or natural or human-made disasters and who have not crossed an international border. "New Displacement" refers to the number of new cases or incidents of displacement recorded over the specified year, rather than the number of people displaced. This is done because people may have been displaced more than once.