Belarus vs North Korea: Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled
Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- North Korea
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 1.60 billion current USD against 1.49 billion current USD in Belarus, a difference of 113.05 million current USD.
That makes North Korea's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Korea ahead.
Belarus ranks 72nd and North Korea ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 125.60 million current USD | 0 current USD | 125.60 million current USD | Belarus |
| 2000s | 445.82 million current USD | 0 current USD | 445.82 million current USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 794.10 million current USD | 483.13 million current USD | 310.97 million current USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher military expenditure (current usd), gaps filled, Belarus or North Korea?
- North Korea, at 1.60 billion current USD against 1.49 billion current USD in Belarus as of 2018.
- What is the difference in military expenditure (current usd), gaps filled between Belarus and North Korea?
- 113.05 million current USD, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and North Korea?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and North Korea rank globally for military expenditure (current usd), gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 72nd and North Korea ranks 70th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Military expenditure (current USD) with 107 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.