Lesotho vs Timor-Leste: Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled
Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled over time
- Lesotho
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 46.40 million current USD against 36.30 million current USD in Lesotho, a difference of 10.10 million current USD.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 153rd and Timor-Leste ranks 151st of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.69 million current USD | 21.84 million current USD | 14.85 million current USD | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 51.17 million current USD | 28.52 million current USD | 22.65 million current USD | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 36.21 million current USD | 44.70 million current USD | 8.49 million current USD | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher military expenditure (current usd), gaps filled, Lesotho or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 46.40 million current USD against 36.30 million current USD in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in military expenditure (current usd), gaps filled between Lesotho and Timor-Leste?
- 10.10 million current USD, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Timor-Leste?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Timor-Leste rank globally for military expenditure (current usd), gaps filled?
- Lesotho ranks 153rd and Timor-Leste ranks 151st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Military expenditure (current USD) with 107 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.