Barbados vs Fiji: Net acquisition of financial assets
Net acquisition of financial assets over time
- Barbados
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 364.09 million current LCU against 289.04 million current LCU in Barbados, a difference of 75.05 million current LCU.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Fiji ahead.
Barbados ranks 78th and Fiji ranks 77th of 134 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 185.52 million current LCU | 1.03 billion current LCU | 844.95 million current LCU | Fiji |
| 2010s | 227.29 million current LCU | -73.27 million current LCU | 300.56 million current LCU | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net acquisition of financial assets, Barbados or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 364.09 million current LCU against 289.04 million current LCU in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net acquisition of financial assets between Barbados and Fiji?
- 75.05 million current LCU, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Fiji?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2016.
- How do Barbados and Fiji rank globally for net acquisition of financial assets?
- Barbados ranks 78th and Fiji ranks 77th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Net acquisition of financial assets (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net acquisition of government financial assets includes domestic and foreign financial claims, SDRs, and gold bullion held by monetary authorities as a reserve asset. The net acquisition of financial assets should be offset by the net incurrence of liabilities. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.