Belize vs Namibia: Net acquisition of financial assets
Net acquisition of financial assets over time
- Belize
- Namibia
How they compare
Belize currently reports 14.17 million current LCU against 9.05 million current LCU in Namibia, a difference of 5.12 million current LCU.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.6 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 96th of 134 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.33 million current LCU | 838.19 million current LCU | 836.86 million current LCU | Namibia |
| 2010s | 47.51 million current LCU | 606.98 million current LCU | 559.46 million current LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net acquisition of financial assets, Belize or Namibia?
- Belize, at 14.17 million current LCU against 9.05 million current LCU in Namibia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net acquisition of financial assets between Belize and Namibia?
- 5.12 million current LCU, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Namibia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Belize and Namibia rank globally for net acquisition of financial assets?
- Belize ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 96th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Net acquisition of financial assets (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net acquisition of government financial assets includes domestic and foreign financial claims, SDRs, and gold bullion held by monetary authorities as a reserve asset. The net acquisition of financial assets should be offset by the net incurrence of liabilities. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.