Brazil vs Canada: Net acquisition of financial assets
Net acquisition of financial assets over time
- Brazil
- Canada
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 179.80 billion current LCU against 121.60 billion current LCU in Canada, a difference of 58.20 billion current LCU.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.5 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 26th and Canada ranks 29th of 134 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Canada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 58.95 billion current LCU | 29.85 billion current LCU | 29.09 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 26.95 billion current LCU | 117.32 billion current LCU | 90.37 billion current LCU | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net acquisition of financial assets, Brazil or Canada?
- Brazil, at 179.80 billion current LCU against 121.60 billion current LCU in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net acquisition of financial assets between Brazil and Canada?
- 58.20 billion current LCU, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Canada?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Canada rank globally for net acquisition of financial assets?
- Brazil ranks 26th and Canada ranks 29th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Net acquisition of financial assets (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net acquisition of government financial assets includes domestic and foreign financial claims, SDRs, and gold bullion held by monetary authorities as a reserve asset. The net acquisition of financial assets should be offset by the net incurrence of liabilities. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.