Botswana vs Malta: Net incurrence of liabilities, total
Net incurrence of liabilities, total over time
- Botswana
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 3.1% against 3.1% in Botswana, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 70th and Malta ranks 69th of 136 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net incurrence of liabilities, total, Botswana or Malta?
- Malta, at 3.1% against 3.1% in Botswana as of 1994.
- What is the difference in net incurrence of liabilities, total between Botswana and Malta?
- 0.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1994.
- How do Botswana and Malta rank globally for net incurrence of liabilities, total?
- Botswana ranks 70th and Malta ranks 69th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Net incurrence of liabilities, total (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net incurrence of government liabilities includes foreign financing (obtained from nonresidents) and domestic financing (obtained from residents), or the means by which a government provides financial resources to cover a budget deficit or allocates financial resources arising from a budget surplus. The net incurrence of liabilities should be offset by the net acquisition of financial assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.