Australia vs Iceland: Net official development assistance (ODA) as a percentage of OECD-DAC
Australia
0.2%
in 2017
Iceland
0.3%
in 2017
Australia rank
22nd
Iceland rank
20th
Net official development assistance (ODA) as a percentage of OECD-DAC over time
- Australia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Australia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 22nd and Iceland ranks 20th of 48 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official development assistance (oda) as a percentage of oecd-dac, Australia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Australia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net official development assistance (oda) as a percentage of oecd-dac between Australia and Iceland?
- 0.1%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for net official development assistance (oda) as a percentage of oecd-dac?
- Australia ranks 22nd and Iceland ranks 20th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Net official development assistance (ODA) as a percentage of OECD-DAC donors' GNI, by donor countries (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.