Belarus vs Lesotho: Other expense
Other expense over time
- Belarus
- Lesotho
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.72 billion current LCU against 1.48 billion current LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 232.37 million current LCU.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.
Belarus ranks 111th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.11 million current LCU | 51.61 million current LCU | 49.50 million current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 129.34 million current LCU | 392.61 million current LCU | 263.27 million current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 590.38 million current LCU | 728.89 million current LCU | 138.50 million current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 2.84 billion current LCU | 1.23 billion current LCU | 1.61 billion current LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other expense, Belarus or Lesotho?
- Belarus, at 1.72 billion current LCU against 1.48 billion current LCU in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other expense between Belarus and Lesotho?
- 232.37 million current LCU, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lesotho?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Lesotho rank globally for other expense?
- Belarus ranks 111th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Other expense (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other expense is spending on dividends, rent, and other miscellaneous expenses, including provision for consumption of fixed capital. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.