Czechia vs United Kingdom: R&D Environmental protection (Domestic Currency)
Czechia
1.53 billion
in 2021
United Kingdom
1.05 billion
in 2022
Czechia rank
7th
United Kingdom rank
10th
R&D Environmental protection (Domestic Currency) over time
- Czechia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1.53 billion against 1.05 billion in United Kingdom, a difference of 483.00 million.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.5 times United Kingdom's.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 7th and United Kingdom ranks 10th of 89 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 593.80 million | 129.00 million | 464.80 million | Czechia |
| 2000s | 805.50 million | 448.70 million | 356.80 million | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1.04 billion | 638.60 million | 404.70 million | Czechia |
| 2020s | 1.47 billion | 616.00 million | 852.50 million | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection, Czechia or United Kingdom?
- Czechia, at 1.53 billion against 1.05 billion in United Kingdom as of 2021.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection between Czechia and United Kingdom?
- 483.00 million, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and United Kingdom?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Czechia and United Kingdom rank globally for r&d environmental protection?
- Czechia ranks 7th and United Kingdom ranks 10th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as R&D Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).