Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritius: Recreation, culture and religion, Ratio of this level of government's
Recreation, culture and religion, Ratio of this level of government's over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.8087 against 0.7475 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0612.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mauritius ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 10th of 59 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher recreation, culture and religion, ratio of this level of government's, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.8087 against 0.7475 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in recreation, culture and religion, ratio of this level of government's between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 0.0612, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius rank globally for recreation, culture and religion, ratio of this level of government's?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 10th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Recreation, culture and religion, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.