Australia vs Mexico: Revenue decentralization, Percent
Revenue decentralization, Percent over time
- Australia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0.754 against 0.7312 in Australia, a difference of 0.0228.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 26th and Mexico ranks 23rd of 67 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6935 | 0.6478 | 0.0457 | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.7409 | 0.7552 | 0.0143 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.7216 | 0.7731 | 0.0515 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.7312 | 0.754 | 0.0228 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue decentralization, percent, Australia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 0.754 against 0.7312 in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in revenue decentralization, percent between Australia and Mexico?
- 0.0228, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for revenue decentralization, percent?
- Australia ranks 26th and Mexico ranks 23rd of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Revenue decentralization, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.