Afghanistan vs Nicaragua: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Afghanistan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 167.62 billion current LCU against 155.23 billion current LCU in Nicaragua, a difference of 12.38 billion current LCU.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 85th and Nicaragua ranks 86th of 157 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.85 billion current LCU | 21.35 billion current LCU | 21.49 billion current LCU | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 117.29 billion current LCU | 49.46 billion current LCU | 67.84 billion current LCU | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled, Afghanistan or Nicaragua?
- Afghanistan, at 167.62 billion current LCU against 155.23 billion current LCU in Nicaragua as of 2017.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled between Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
- 12.38 billion current LCU, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Afghanistan and Nicaragua rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Afghanistan ranks 85th and Nicaragua ranks 86th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) with 57 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.