Bhutan vs Ecuador: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled
Bhutan
36.47 billion current LCU
in 2020
Ecuador
35.96 billion current LCU
in 2022
Bhutan rank
113th
Ecuador rank
115th
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Bhutan
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 36.47 billion current LCU against 35.96 billion current LCU in Ecuador, a difference of 515.50 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Ecuador ahead.
Bhutan ranks 113th and Ecuador ranks 115th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.75 billion current LCU | 30.26 billion current LCU | 1.52 billion current LCU | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 36.47 billion current LCU | 26.00 billion current LCU | 10.47 billion current LCU | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled, Bhutan or Ecuador?
- Bhutan, at 36.47 billion current LCU against 35.96 billion current LCU in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled between Bhutan and Ecuador?
- 515.50 million current LCU, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ecuador?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Bhutan and Ecuador rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Bhutan ranks 113th and Ecuador ranks 115th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) with 57 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.