Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled
Brazil
3.12 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Sri Lanka
3.05 trillion current LCU
in 2023
Brazil rank
38th
Sri Lanka rank
39th
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 3.12 trillion current LCU against 3.05 trillion current LCU in Sri Lanka, a difference of 66.43 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 157 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.46 trillion current LCU | 1.39 trillion current LCU | 71.07 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 2.35 trillion current LCU | 1.96 trillion current LCU | 386.91 billion current LCU | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 3.12 trillion current LCU against 3.05 trillion current LCU in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 66.43 billion current LCU, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) with 57 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.