China vs Kazakhstan: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled
China
20.13 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Kazakhstan
19.75 trillion current LCU
in 2023
China rank
19th
Kazakhstan rank
20th
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
China currently reports 20.13 trillion current LCU against 19.75 trillion current LCU in Kazakhstan, a difference of 378.60 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
China ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 20th of 157 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.98 trillion current LCU | 7.47 trillion current LCU | 2.51 trillion current LCU | China |
| 2020s | 17.26 trillion current LCU | 14.00 trillion current LCU | 3.26 trillion current LCU | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled, China or Kazakhstan?
- China, at 20.13 trillion current LCU against 19.75 trillion current LCU in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled between China and Kazakhstan?
- 378.60 billion current LCU, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled?
- China ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 20th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) with 57 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.