Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3.21 trillion current LCU against 3.05 trillion current LCU in Sri Lanka, a difference of 158.91 billion current LCU.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Rwanda ranks 36th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.97 billion current LCU | 76.61 billion current LCU | 50.64 billion current LCU | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 1.45 trillion current LCU | 1.66 trillion current LCU | 208.35 billion current LCU | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2.58 trillion current LCU | 1.96 trillion current LCU | 614.49 billion current LCU | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 3.21 trillion current LCU against 3.05 trillion current LCU in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 158.91 billion current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Rwanda ranks 36th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) with 57 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.