Brazil vs China: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per capita
Brazil
14,695 current LCU per person
in 2024
China
14,287 current LCU per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
97th
China rank
100th
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per capita over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 14,695 current LCU per person against 14,287 current LCU per person in China, a difference of 408 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 97th and China ranks 100th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,253 current LCU per person | 7,215 current LCU per person | 37.37 current LCU per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 11,889 current LCU per person | 12,638 current LCU per person | 749.04 current LCU per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per capita, Brazil or China?
- Brazil, at 14,695 current LCU per person against 14,287 current LCU per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per capita between Brazil and China?
- 408 current LCU per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 97th and China ranks 100th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.