Brazil vs Eswatini: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per capita
Brazil
14,695 current LCU per person
in 2024
Eswatini
14,776 current LCU per person
in 2021
Brazil rank
97th
Eswatini rank
96th
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per capita over time
- Brazil
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 14,776 current LCU per person against 14,695 current LCU per person in Brazil, a difference of 81 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 97th and Eswatini ranks 96th of 157 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,299 current LCU per person | 11,038 current LCU per person | 3,739 current LCU per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 9,345 current LCU per person | 15,174 current LCU per person | 5,829 current LCU per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per capita, Brazil or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 14,776 current LCU per person against 14,695 current LCU per person in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per capita between Brazil and Eswatini?
- 81 current LCU per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 97th and Eswatini ranks 96th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.