Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
25.87 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of
28.51 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
30th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
27th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0M20.0M30.0M200120122023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 28.51 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.87 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.64 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 157 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 5.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 20,880 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 12.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 589,709 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 23.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 454,350 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 28.51 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.87 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2.64 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
How do Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/tanzania/">Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.