China vs Kyrgyzstan: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

China
2.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
87th
Kyrgyzstan rank
85th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Kyrgyzstan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M200520142023

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.08 million current LCU per square kilometre in China, a difference of 55,440 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China ahead.

China ranks 87th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 157 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2010s 1.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 745,623 current LCU per square kilometre 624,847 current LCU per square kilometre China
2020s 1.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 423,470 current LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, China or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.08 million current LCU per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between China and Kyrgyzstan?
55,440 current LCU per square kilometre, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kyrgyzstan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do China and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
China ranks 87th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Kyrgyzstan: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/kyrgyz-republic/">China vs Kyrgyzstan: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.