Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
8.25 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
Norway
7.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
54th
Norway rank
56th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Norway
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197219972023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 8.25 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 640,950 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th and Norway ranks 56th of 157 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 166.92 current LCU per square kilometre 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2000s 268,521 current LCU per square kilometre 2.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2010s 1.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2020s 5.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 759,483 current LCU per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Norway?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 8.25 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2022.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway?
640,950 current LCU per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th and Norway ranks 56th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/norway/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.