Egypt vs New Zealand: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

Egypt
515,286 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2015
New Zealand
510,345 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
113th
New Zealand rank
114th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197219972023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 515,286 current LCU per square kilometre against 510,345 current LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 4,941 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1975 it was New Zealand ahead.

Egypt ranks 113th and New Zealand ranks 114th of 157 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 3,111 current LCU per square kilometre 19,288 current LCU per square kilometre 16,177 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 12,788 current LCU per square kilometre 65,269 current LCU per square kilometre 52,481 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 169,840 current LCU per square kilometre 225,394 current LCU per square kilometre 55,554 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 380,605 current LCU per square kilometre 283,997 current LCU per square kilometre 96,608 current LCU per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, Egypt or New Zealand?
Egypt, at 515,286 current LCU per square kilometre against 510,345 current LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2015.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between Egypt and New Zealand?
4,941 current LCU per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and New Zealand?
27 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2015.
How do Egypt and New Zealand rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 113th and New Zealand ranks 114th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs New Zealand: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/new-zealand/">Egypt vs New Zealand: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.