Romania vs South Africa: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

Romania
2.02 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
1.74 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
88th
South Africa rank
90th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Romania
  • South Africa
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M197219972023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 2.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.74 million current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 282,720 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was South Africa ahead.

Romania ranks 88th and South Africa ranks 90th of 157 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 96.12 current LCU per square kilometre 5,406 current LCU per square kilometre 5,310 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 140.22 current LCU per square kilometre 27,822 current LCU per square kilometre 27,682 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 18,585 current LCU per square kilometre 112,857 current LCU per square kilometre 94,271 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 385,458 current LCU per square kilometre 382,052 current LCU per square kilometre 3,406 current LCU per square kilometre Romania
2010s 944,720 current LCU per square kilometre 1.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 56,995 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 1.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 116,180 current LCU per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, Romania or South Africa?
Romania, at 2.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.74 million current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between Romania and South Africa?
282,720 current LCU per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Romania ranks 88th and South Africa ranks 90th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs South Africa: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/">Romania vs South Africa: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.