Bolivia vs Georgia: Revenue, excluding grants
Bolivia
23.97 billion current LCU
in 2007
Georgia
26.70 billion current LCU
in 2024
Bolivia rank
122nd
Georgia rank
121st
Revenue, excluding grants over time
- Bolivia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 26.70 billion current LCU against 23.97 billion current LCU in Bolivia, a difference of 2.74 billion current LCU.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 122nd and Georgia ranks 121st of 157 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.13 billion current LCU | 532.43 million current LCU | 6.60 billion current LCU | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 14.68 billion current LCU | 2.11 billion current LCU | 12.57 billion current LCU | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher revenue, excluding grants, Bolivia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 26.70 billion current LCU against 23.97 billion current LCU in Bolivia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants between Bolivia and Georgia?
- 2.74 billion current LCU, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Georgia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Bolivia and Georgia rank globally for revenue, excluding grants?
- Bolivia ranks 122nd and Georgia ranks 121st of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Revenue is an increase in net worth resulting from a transaction. Grants are excluded from this figure. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.