Equatorial Guinea vs South Sudan: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 32.15 scale 0-100 against 27.12 scale 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 5.03 scale 0-100.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 179th and South Sudan ranks 181st of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): overall score, Equatorial Guinea or South Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 32.15 scale 0-100 against 27.12 scale 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): overall score between Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 5.03 scale 0-100, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): overall score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 179th and South Sudan ranks 181st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SPI overall score is a composite score measuring country performance across five pillars: data use, data services, data products, data sources, and data infrastructure. The new Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI) will replace the Statistical Capacity Index (SCI), which the World Bank has regularly published since 2004. Although the goals are the same, to offer a better tool to measure the statistical systems of countries, the new SPI framework has expanded into new areas including in the areas of data use, administrative data, geospatial data, data services, and data infrastructure. The SPI provides a framework that can help countries measure where they stand in several dimensions and offers an ambitious measurement agenda for the international community.