Latvia vs Singapore: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score over time
- Latvia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 88.32 scale 0-100 against 88.08 scale 0-100 in Latvia, a difference of 0.24 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 30th and Singapore ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.82 scale 0-100 | 72.33 scale 0-100 | 11.49 scale 0-100 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 88.12 scale 0-100 | 86.07 scale 0-100 | 2.05 scale 0-100 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): overall score, Latvia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 88.32 scale 0-100 against 88.08 scale 0-100 in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): overall score between Latvia and Singapore?
- 0.24 scale 0-100, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): overall score?
- Latvia ranks 30th and Singapore ranks 28th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SPI overall score is a composite score measuring country performance across five pillars: data use, data services, data products, data sources, and data infrastructure. The new Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI) will replace the Statistical Capacity Index (SCI), which the World Bank has regularly published since 2004. Although the goals are the same, to offer a better tool to measure the statistical systems of countries, the new SPI framework has expanded into new areas including in the areas of data use, administrative data, geospatial data, data services, and data infrastructure. The SPI provides a framework that can help countries measure where they stand in several dimensions and offers an ambitious measurement agenda for the international community.