Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score

Bhutan
70 scale 0-100
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina
70 scale 0-100
in 2024
Bhutan rank
126th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
126th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
20406080100200420142024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 70 scale 0-100 against 70 scale 0-100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 126th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th of 216 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 20 scale 0-100 35 scale 0-100 15 scale 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 60 scale 0-100 67 scale 0-100 7 scale 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 70 scale 0-100 70 scale 0-100 0 scale 0-100

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score, Bhutan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bhutan, at 70 scale 0-100 against 70 scale 0-100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score between Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0 scale 0-100, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score?
Bhutan ranks 126th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-1-data-use-score-scale-0-100/bhutan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-1-data-use-score-scale-0-100/bhutan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 4,593 data points, 2004–2024
Last refreshed

The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.