Faroe Islands vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score

Faroe Islands
40 scale 0-100
in 2024
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
40 scale 0-100
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
186th
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
186th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
010203040200420142024

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has been ahead every year.

Faroe Islands ranks 186th and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 186th of 217 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
2000s 0 scale 0-100 0 scale 0-100 0 scale 0-100
2010s 18 scale 0-100 18 scale 0-100 0 scale 0-100
2020s 40 scale 0-100 40 scale 0-100 0 scale 0-100

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score, Faroe Islands or Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Faroe Islands, at 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score between Faroe Islands and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0 scale 0-100, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Faroe Islands and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score?
Faroe Islands ranks 186th and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 186th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-1-data-use-score-scale-0-100/faroe-islands/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-1-data-use-score-scale-0-100/faroe-islands/macao-sar-china/">Faroe Islands vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 4,593 data points, 2004–2024
Last refreshed

The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.